Sword coast legends mods nexus1/31/2024 ![]() I believe this is a misconception, as it depends on either your insertion point into the D&D universe or the breadth of your experience and association with its’ many rule editions over the years. Some have argued "but it's not a D&D game" and then gave it a negative review based (and many people, solely or mainly) on that. multi-player and Dungeon Master features. ![]() Not really a comprehensive review as I have so far only completed the Single Player campaign and a few dungeons, and I have not yet used it's most touted modes i.e. Speaking of the game here is how I looked at it: Feel free to post reasons why the like or don’t the game. Not posting this as an attack, I just don’t agree with the logic you used. So yes, a company that only developed "good games" and hit home runs nearly every at bat still went under. So here one of the most critically beloved companies that produced some of the most beloved games of all times still went under. (Good) RPGs were and still are more expensive to produce on a sales ratio basis. IMO, ratio of production cost to profit margin. With 12 /13 games developed/published being critical darlings and 10 or so of them being sales successes, how did they fail? Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance III (cancelled 2004). Baldur's Gate III: The Black Hound (cancelled 2003), one of the most highly anticipated RPGs ever,ģ. Van Buren, AKA "Fallout 3" (cancelled 2003), fire-saled the rights to Bethesda to keep company afloat,Ģ. The games it had in development when they went under were:ġ. So, where did they go wrong? Where were they spending money when they died? Lionheart: Legacy of the Crusader (2003). Baldur's Gate II: Throne of Bhaal (2001), andĥ. Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn (2000),Ĥ. Baldur's Gate: Tales of the Sword Coast (1999),ģ. Pretty much an all Hall of Fame line-up there.Ģ. Icewind Dale: Heart of Winter - Trials of the Luremaster (2001),Ĩ. Great games don't bankrupt gaming companies" be a specious argument?īlack Isle Studios: Went bankrupt after it developed/published a string of classics.Ħ. They make a profit and the company that made them get to go on and make more games. Why would a statement like "It failed and is no longer available for purchase. If you would like to rate the game as bad – feel free - go ahead - but the argument should be based on the game elements as the overall success of the company that developed/published it irrelevant to the conversation. It's the same as saying you're allowed to have an opinion but they don't really matter as you're not as good/smart/experienced as me. To start out by saying that "your allowed to have and opinion" then denigrate the person for stating an opinion contrary to yours seems a little hypocritical. Great games don't bankrupt gaming companies. It failed and is no longer available for purchase. ![]() But there are things that are just wrong with the rules and mechanics and the choices that the Dev's made that took it very far from a D&D adventure. Originally posted by Damn_Monkey:While you're allowed to have an opinion, some things are just objectively bad.Īt a surface level, single play through with out reading too deep into it, this game isn't all that bad.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |